Some years ago, I became familiar with companion planting—putting
different plants together in a garden or guild that produce benefits like
mineral accumulation, attraction of pollinators, attraction of beneficial
insect predators, repulsion of pests or larger animals, and so forth. One of
the most common recommendations, even though it has a tendency to become
aggressive in its own propagation, is tansy. Tansy has clusters of yellow flowers
that will attract bees but repel squash bugs, mice, and Japanese beetles; and
tansy draws potassium up into the topsoil and shares with neighbors. Tansy was
also used, way back in the day, as an abortifacient.
Hildegard of Bingen (1098 – 1179), a saint, polymath, and
founder of German natural science, actually recommended tansy as an abortifacient,
which may strike many as odd, because this remarkable Catholic woman would be
anathematized by that same Church today for making this recommendation. The
twelfth century Church was opposed to abortion, as had most Christians been—at least
since the end of the first century; but not because the Church had “a
consistent life ethic.” It wasn’t until the late sixteenth century, when the
Catholic Church had abandoned its disbelief in witches and joined in the orgy
of violence against accused witches, that the Church—following the logic of
Jean Bodin—accused anyone who provided abortifacients or performed abortions of
being a witch. Only then did the Church categorically call all abortions
murder.
Witch-killing coevolved with the Enlightenment and shared
many of the beliefs and assumptions of the so-called fathers of the
Enlightenment. First case in point is Jean Bodin. A Catholic, Bodin is
remembered principally as a lawyer and political philosopher. His political
philosophy revolved around social order, which was perceived to be in short
supply during his life (1530–96). He specifically called for the establishment
of powerful central states. He called for dialogue between the various
Abrahamic religions, and he placed minimal emphasis on the church as a
political actor. He is rightly seen as one of the fathers of the Enlightenment,
and yet his life will always be notorious for his enthusiasm for killing women
as witches. [Maria] Mies writes,
The persecution of the witches was a manifestation of the
rising modern society and not, as is usually believed, a remnant of the
irrational “dark” Middle Ages. This is most clearly shown by Jean Bodin, the
French theoretician of the new mercantilist economic doctrine. Jean Bodin was
the founder of the quantitative theory of money, of the modern concept of
sovereignty and of mercantilist populationism. He was a staunch defender of modern
rationalism, and was at the same time one of the most vocal proponents of state
ordained massacres and tortures of the witches.
Bodin believed, prefiguring Hobbes and Hegel, in an
absolutist state, whose principle responsibilities included supplying human
beings for the labor force. He believed that witches and midwives were enemies
of the state because, according to Bodin, they caused infertility and performed
abortions. He further believed that “witches” taught women birth control, a practice
he equated with murder. Bodin wrote a pamphlet against purported witches that
was remarkable above all for the cruelty of its recommended punishments for
witchcraft. Witches should be prosecuted, according to Jean Bodin, based on the
idea that women practicing witchcraft outnumbered men by a ratio of fifty to
one. (Borderline, pp. 55–6)
Prior to these developments, and
still more than a thousand years after the Pentecost, the modern “fetus” had
not yet been invented. The unborn were seen in two phases: pre-ensoulment and
post-ensoulment. Ensoulment was signaled by the quickening, the sensation of the
baby’s movement in the womb, something that happens as early as fifteen weeks
into a pregnancy, and as late as twenty weeks. Abortion was not considered
murder until after ensoulment, or the quickening.
It wasn’t until 1588 that a Papal
bull from Pope Sixtus V was issued declaring all abortion at any stage to be
grounds for excommunication. Sixtus’ replacement, Pope Gregory XIV, in the face
of the disruptions the bull had caused, reversed Sixtus and returned the Church
to its old standard of no abortion of the “formed” unborn—that is, after the
quickening. Pope Pius IX then reversed the reversal in 1869—four years after the
end of the American Civil War—and this latest prohibition of all abortions was
evaded using various loopholes that returned Catholics as a whole back to the
quickening standard de facto, of not de jure. It was not until 1917, the same
year as the Bolshevik Revolution, that Canon law decisively erased the
distinction between “unformed” (pre-quickening) and “formed” (post-quickening).
“Fetus,” prior to the late fourteenth
century simply meant “birth.” By the fifteenth century it came to mean unborn
(at any stage, “fetus” = inside the womb). Da Vinci’s dissection of corpses led
to him being the first person to publish the idea of fetal development in
systematic stages. The debate about the homunculus (an unborn baby being a
miniature version of its born self) wasn’t settled until the early eighteenth
century. It was only by the twentieth century that developmental embryology
gave us the outlines of what we call a “fetus” today—a stage of pregnancy, beginning arbitrarily at nine weeks after
conception, that is now recognized in medical protocols and law, even though
there are variances in actual individual pregnancies.
What is interesting here is how
Church doctrine and scientific enquiry perform their dialectical dance in the
twentieth century, when in 1930, Pope Pius XI declared all abortion to be “the direct
murder of the innocent.” And yet by the 1960s and Vatican II, Church teaching stated:
“Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception.” By
1971, we hear the first utterance of the phrase “consistent life ethic,” from
Boston Archbishop Humberto Medeiros, taken up subsequently by Chicago Archbishop
Joseph Bernardin (he of the Church sex abuse scandal), whereupon “consistent
life ethic” came to mean opposition to abortion, capital punishment, euthanasia,
“unjust” war, and economic injustices that resulted in loss of life—the “seamless
garment” ethic, a term coined by Catholic pacifist and civil rights advocate,
Eileen Egan.
It is somewhat striking that until
1930, “life” was not the issue, and it was not consolidated in the minds of
Catholics—and then others—until 1971 in the run-up to the 1973 Supreme Court
judgement in Roe v. Wade, which transferred the authority to decide about abortion
prior to the twenty-third week to the actual pregnant woman. Quickening was
replaced by a new standard—“viability,” that is, the ability of the fetus to
survive outside the womb—bowing to the equality of women with men with regard
to bodily autonomy, or “the proprietary body,” at the center of liberal
philosophy.
In 1980, the Church focused its arguments
on “pregnant women,” or “expectant mothers,” or “rights of fathers,” for all
the blatant sexism of the Church inhering in virtually every Church document on
the issue of sex, still focusing on actual people and their consciences. By the
1989, however, numerous denominations in Germany had joined the call to protect
LIFE in a joint statement. In English, the title of the joint statement was, “God
is a Friend of Life.” In this publication, the signatories said that Life is “a
complex ecosystem like a forest, the self-development of a human being from the
fertilized egg cell to the newborn and its further growth.” As Barbara Duden so
cryptically put it, “women are eclipsed by something entirely new—life.” The Church was no longer using
the term life in any way representative of Jewish or Judeo-Christian tradition,
but in the same was as Erwin Schrodinger—as a property of a thing, an abstraction.
By 1991, Pope John Paul II,
speaking before 141 Cardinals in Rome, declared war on abortion, saying “death
and life are involved in a momentous conflict,” little realizing how life used this was conforms utterly to
this modernist abstraction, or how, in reality, death is not opposed to life,
but the inevitable outcome of living.
The Church, when it comes to
modernity, wants to have its cake and eat it, too. And the constant, through
all these changes, as is true with every other change in the history of the
Church adapting itself to politics and power, is that men decide what women are
and what women can and cannot do.
Do with this as you will.
No comments:
Post a Comment